Coincidence Theory: Television and Mind Control

I sat down one day and read that Congress is mandating the use of Digital Signals to be broadcast by the major television and cable companies. I began to wonder why government would demand such a thing. It really didn’t seem to me to be very healthy or to be something within the power of Congress to mandate.

by Eric Nordstrom

Free market competition is a far greater stimulant toward ‘forcing’ a company to change formats. Naturally the old rules of free market economics, liberty, freedom and small government is now virtually at an end. So, at first glance I stored the question in the back of my mind and moved on.

Ever since I ran into a video by a man called Jordan Maxwell I seem to look at words and symbols differently. Sometimes I feel like an archeologist as I read text now I tend to wonder what the root meanings of words are, what the historic references are to words are and I can’t seem to shake the fact that I always run into multiple odd connections.

Most of the public are aware of a term called “conspiracy theory” far fewer are aware of the term “coincidence theory”. Coincidence theory is essentially the theory that any time one runs into an oddity of facts or a strange set of matching or corroborating data, if the facts or data are beyond the scope of the collective reality, it must be coincidence.

I, like many people, do not believe in coincidence.Congress mandating the shift from analog to digital programming seemed to me to be out of left field so I pondered. Here is some of the information I dug up. I researched the history of television and found some strange occult connections and mind control and from that, I followed the white rabbit. I’ll leave it to you to decide if there is any knowledge to glean from it all.

Digital television reduces the signal to noise ratio to near zero. It also allows for multiple streams of data to flow through a single distinct channel. Where an individual would need to see a repetitive signal with analog to have an effect on the subconscious mind, digital will take it from chronic viewing requirements to acute.
The older model of television did not use a pixel based technology. Instead it used a repeated pattern of clusters of colored cells. The organized pattern of colors, viewed from a distance generated a pattern when seen. Today, these cells of color are simply smaller but in all cases whether old or new technology, these patterns of colored light can be seen and translated into an image when viewed from a distance.

We all know that in general the color blue can induce a relaxed mental state while the color red can induce passion. Colors, patters, tones, sounds and other stimulations of our senses have a strong impact on the subconscious. The mind can translate very complicated patterns of light and give it meaning. In a nutshell, the patterns of colored light we see on a monitor of any kind is all data, it is all information. The biggest difference with respect to raw data is that digital signals and digital television is simply capable of transmitting far more data to the brain within a given period of time.

TVI decided to take a single sentence and deconstruct the meanings, histories or other uses of the words to see if there were any patters that emerged. If there were any odd patterns, then I suppose that many will consider them to be merely a coincidence.

“Government control over channels and programs broadcast typically through the medium of television.”General Breakdown of words common to the Television Broadcasting industry.

HAARP

The list below is far from scientific method and is more aligned with gut instinct or common references. The intent is to find connections within the words by their root meanings, alternative use, or implied understanding:

Television: Transfer of a mental vision or perspective.
Television: The original cathode ray tube was invented in an attempt to contact the dead. (Connections to Aleister Crowley)
Television: The first electronic image to ever be created was the Maltese cross.
Television: The first public broadcast was the Adolph Olympics.
Television: Brings the mind into an altered dream state, namely the brain waves (alpha, beta and theta waves)
Aleister Crowley: Connections to Barbara Bush (interesting, look this one up)
Vision: The mind has vision. The subconscious mind does not know the difference between dream and waking vision.
Channels: A route or path for a flow of information or matter.
Channel: Mediums channel. They channel between the living and the dead etc.
Mediums: Persons capable of channeling information between realms. (See Channel)
Medium: Format for the transfer of information.
Programs: A computer related set of instructions typically to perform a specific function.
Program: (to program) to intentionally alter the specific function or activity.
Program: A mode of operation, a directive or a worldview. (Get with the program)
Program: (to reprogram) modern lexicon based on current technology, previous Dark Age lexicon equivalent word is “spell”.
Broadcast: To broadly cast a specific program through a medium.
Cast: To cast a spell.
Government: Literally means ‘mind control’. (Latin: Gobernus Mente)
Gobernus (Latin): Means guide or control.
Mente (Latin): Means Mind.

Digital TV: Mind Control by the Sound of Silence

Introduction by After America

Yesterday I spoke with a friend of mine in America. She told me that since June 17, 2009 the Analog Television signal in the USA was switched off for digital TV. It’s over folks, if you do not call your cable company and turn off your digital cable right here right now, you will quickly lose your ability to make your own decisions and/or control your own life. Read on and please wake up.

This is an extremely timely and important essay. It overviews a secret Pentagon psychotronics technology known as Silent Sound Spread Spectrum (SSSS) that has been fully operational since the early 1990s. I first found out about the use of this technology from Al Bielek in a 1992 video he made with Vladimir Terziski. This technology was used against battle-hardened Iraqi troops fortified in deep underground bunkers in Kuwait and Iraq in the first Gulf War in January of 1991.

The physical, emotional, and psychological effects of this technology were so severe that hundreds of thousands of Iraqi troops surrended en masse without firing even a single shot against US led coalition forces. The numbers reported in the news were staggering: 75,000 and then annother 125,000 (or more) Iraqi troops would come out of their deep desert bunkers waving white flags and falling to their knees before approaching US troops and literally kiss their captor’s boots or hands if given the opportunity.

Why would eight year veterans of Middle Eastern warfare (with Iran 1980-1988) behave this way? Simple. They were subjected to a technology that was so extreme and incomprehensible that they were suddenly reduced to the level of compliant children and felt grateful to still be alive in the wake of their mind-wrenching experience.

This technology is about to be used, albeit in a more subtle fashion, against American citizens in a highly classified and covert operation to mind control and manipulate the entire population into ‘compliance’ with our New World order overlords. The technology will utilize a combination of HAARP transmitters, GWEN towers, microwave cell phone towers, and the soon-to-be-mandatory High Definition Digital TV that will enter your home via: a) cable, b) satellite, c) HD TVs, or d) those oh-so-easy-to-obtain “digital converter boxes” that the government is so anxious to help you obtain and underwrite most of the cost on your behalf.

But why is the government so anxious to help American citizens experience a clearer and more highly defined television picture? Does that make sense to you? Since when is the government so concerned about the visual quality of our televised entertainment that congress would pass an undebated statutory proclamation which mandated that the HD conversion take place on Feb. 17, 2009 and and then subsidze about 90% of the associated cost?

I’m only guessing, but if there are 200 million “regular” televisions in America to be converted into HD, then that $40 in government subsidy per TV x 200,000,000 = $8 billion. Why is the government so anxious to spend 8 billion dollars on her citizens to improve the clarity of a TV picture? Or is the recently touted “additional bandwidth” cover story that supposedly is to be gained with the HD technology the only and genuine reason for spending so much taxpayer dollars on HD conversion?

The second service that this author performs is to “out” two of our more deceptive CIA/Pentagon ‘assets’ masquerading under the rubric of natural health advocates. Their names are Rima Laibow and her husband, “former” Major General Albert Stubblebine. If your e-mail Inbox has been filling with warnings and articles in recent months about the coming Codex regulations and the “wonderful” job that Rima and her retired Army husband have been doing to try and stem the tide, then you know who I’m talking about.

Folks, is it time to wake up yet? Or should we just resume our slumber and wait for them to take us away in those spiffy Gunderson cattle cars that Phil Schneider warned us about in 1995 (you know, the ones with the built in shackles and manacles)?

- Ken Adachi, Educate Yourself.org]

War is peace. Ignorance is strength

Written by John Pilger Barack Obama, winner of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, is planning another war to add to his impressive record. In Afghanistan, his agents routinely extinguish wedding parties, farmers and construction workers with weapons such as the innovative Hellfire missile, which sucks the air out of your lungs. According to the UN, 338,000 Afghan infants are dying under the Obama-led alliance, which permits only $29 per head annually to be spent on medical care. Within weeks of his inauguration, Obama started a new war in Pakistan, causing more than a million people to flee their homes. In threatening Iran – which his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, said she was prepared to “obliterate” – Obama lied that the Iranians were covering up a “secret nuclear facility”, knowing that it had already been reported to the International Atomic Energy Authority. In colluding with the only nuclear-armed power in the Middle East, he bribed the Palestinian Authority to suppress a UN judgment that Israel had committed crimes against humanity in its assault on Gaza – crimes made possible with US weapons whose shipment Obama secretly approved before his inauguration. At home, the man of peace has approved a military budget exceeding that of any year since the end of the Second World War while presiding over a new kind of domestic repression. During the recent G20 meeting in Pittsburgh, hosted by Obama, militarised police attacked peaceful protesters with something called the Long-Range Acoustic Device, not seen before on US streets. Mounted in the turret of a small tank, it blasted a piercing noise as tear gas and pepper gas were fired indiscriminately. It is part of a new arsenal of “crowd-control munitions” supplied by military contractors such as Ray theon. In Obama’s Pentagon-controlled “national security state”, the concentration camp at Guantanamo Bay, which he promised to close, remains open, and “rendition”, secret assassinations and torture continue. The Nobel Peace Prize-winner’s latest war is largely secret. On 15 July, Washington finalised a deal with Colombia that gives the US seven giant military bases. “The idea,” reported the Associated Press, “is to make Colombia a regional hub for Pentagon operations… nearly half the continent can be covered by a C-17 [military transport] without refuelling”, which “helps achieve the regional engagement strategy”. Translated, this means Obama is planning a “rollback” of the independence and democracy that the people of Bolivia, Venezuela, Ecuador and Paraguay have achieved against the odds, along with a historic regional co-operation that rejects the notion of a US “sphere of influence”. The Colombian regime, which backs death squads and has the continent’s worst human rights record, has received US military support second in scale only to Israel. Britain provides military training. Guided by US military satellites, Colombian paramilitaries now infiltrate Venezuela with the goal of overthrowing the democratic government of Hugo Chávez, which George W Bush failed to do in 2002. Obama’s war on peace and democracy in Latin America follows a style he has demonstrated since the coup against the democratic president of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya, in June. Zelaya had increased the minimum wage, granted subsidies to small farmers, cut back interest rates and reduced poverty. He planned to break a US pharmaceutical monopoly and manufacture cheap generic drugs. Although Obama has called for Zelaya’s reinstatement, he refuses to condemn the coup-makers and to recall the US ambassador or the US troops who train the Honduran forces determined to crush a popular resistance. Zelaya has been repeatedly refused a meeting with Obama, who has approved an IMF loan of $164m to the illegal regime. The message is clear and familiar: thugs can act with impunity on behalf of the US. Obama, the smooth operator from Chicago via Harvard, was enlisted to restore what he calls “leadership” throughout the world. The Nobel Prize committee’s decision is the kind of cloying reverse racism that has beatified the man for no reason other than he is a member of a minority and attractive to liberal sensibilities, if not to the Afghan children he kills. This is the Call of Obama. It is not unlike a dog whistle: inaudible to most, irresistible to the besotted and boneheaded. “When Obama walks into a room,” gushed George Clooney, “you want to follow him somewhere, anywhere.” The great voice of black liberation Frantz Fanon understood this. In The Wretched of the Earth, he described the “intermediary [whose] mission has nothing to do with transforming the nation: it consists, prosaically, of being the transmission line between the nation and a capitalism, rampant though camouflaged”. Because political debate has become so debased in our media monoculture – Blair or Brown; Brown or Cameron – race, gender and class can be used as seductive tools of propaganda and diversion. In Obama’s case, what matters, as Fanon pointed out in an earlier era, is not the intermediary’s “historic” elevation, but the class he serves. After all, Bush’s inner circle was probably the most multiracial in presidential history. There was Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Clarence Thomas, all dutifully serving an extreme and dangerous power. Britain has seen its own Obama-like mysticism. The day after Blair was elected in 1997, the Observer predicted that he would create “new worldwide rules on human rights” while the Guardian rejoiced at the “breathless pace [as] the floodgates of change burst open”. When Obama was elected last November, Denis MacShane MP, a devotee of Blair’s bloodbaths, unwittingly warned us: “I shut my eyes when I listen to this guy and it could be Tony. He is doing the same thing that we did in 1997.”